AI Training Needs Assessment Template: How HR in DACH Maps Skills, Roles, and Use Cases

This AI training needs assessment survey helps you avoid “random AI training” that nobody uses. You collect real data on roles, skills, risks, and use cases – and can then design focused AI programs that fit DACH requirements instead of guessing.

Survey questions

Unless otherwise stated, use a 1–5 scale from “Strongly disagree” (1) to “Strongly agree” (5).

Role & work context

I work in a department where using AI tools is relevant to our daily tasks.
My role involves routine tasks (e.g. data entry, scheduling, reporting) that could be automated.
I regularly use digital tools (e.g. spreadsheets, word processing, email, databases) in my work.
I know which software tools or apps my team uses daily.
Handling sensitive data (customer info, personal data) is part of my job.
Where do you primarily work? (On-site, Remote, Hybrid)
Which best describes your role level? (Individual contributor, Team lead, Manager, Executive)
Which area best describes your function? (HR, Finance, Sales, Marketing, Operations, IT, Other)
My work includes standardized processes or checklists that could be supported by AI.

Current AI usage

I currently use AI-powered features (e.g. smart assistants, text generators, analytics) in my day-to-day work.
I have used a generative AI tool (e.g. ChatGPT, Copilot) to help with a work task.
How often do you use AI tools at work? (Daily, Weekly, Monthly, Rarely, Never)
How often do you use AI tools privately? (Daily, Weekly, Monthly, Rarely, Never)
My department encourages or allows experimenting with new AI tools.
I feel confident trying out new AI software on my own.
My team has access to AI-based analytics or automation tools (even if only as a pilot).
We already use AI in at least one core workflow (e.g. reporting, customer communication, coding).
I know which AI tools are officially approved by our company.

Skills & comfort levels

I understand the basics of how AI and machine learning work.
I can explain the difference between traditional software and AI-based tools in simple words.
I can write an effective prompt or ask an AI tool the right question for a work problem.
I am comfortable evaluating whether AI-generated suggestions are accurate and useful.
I feel anxious or uncertain about using AI tools in my job. (reverse-coded)
I know where to find help or resources if I’m unsure about using an AI tool.
I have the digital skills (e.g. Excel, databases) needed to use advanced AI features.
I can adapt an AI-generated draft (e.g. text, slide, analysis) into a final, high-quality deliverable.
If needed, I could teach a colleague basic AI usage for our team’s workflows.

Use cases & pain points

There are repetitive or tedious tasks in my work that I believe AI could handle.
I spend significant time on data-related tasks (analysis, reporting, research) that AI could speed up.
I regularly struggle with information overload (emails, documents, chats) that slows me down.
I encounter manual bottlenecks (copy-paste, reformatting, double entry) that could be automated.
My team lacks clear guidance on where AI could make our projects better.
We often search for information or references that AI tools could provide faster.
Which top 3 tasks would you most like to support with AI? (Free text or multi-select list)
In which tools would AI support help you most? (Office suite, CRM, ERP, HR system, Other)

Risks & concerns

I am concerned about data privacy when using AI tools at work.
I worry that using AI might inadvertently expose sensitive company or personal data.
I fear that AI might replace some of the tasks I do today.
I trust that our organization has clear rules about what data can be used with AI tools.
I believe we need more training on how to check AI outputs for bias or errors.
I feel anxious about unclear legal or compliance implications of using AI.
I am unsure how GDPR affects what I can paste into AI tools.
I would only feel comfortable using AI at work if works council and data protection have approved it.

Learning preferences

I prefer learning new tools through hands-on exercises instead of only presentations.
Short, self-paced online tutorials (e.g. videos, interactive demos) would help me learn AI skills.
Live team workshops where we work on our real tasks would help me most.
My ideal learning language for AI topics is: (German, English, No preference).
I would participate in a team workshop on AI if it was available.
I am willing to spend some work time to learn new AI tools if they are relevant to my job.
I prefer learning in small units over several weeks rather than in one long training day.
I would like role-specific AI training (e.g. for HR, Sales, Finance) rather than generic sessions.
I am open to guided AI prompts/templates integrated into our existing tools.

Manager & team needs

My manager or team lead supports using AI to improve our work.
We regularly discuss technology updates (like AI tools) in our team meetings.
I feel my team would benefit from a simple AI “how we work with it” guide.
My department needs clear guidelines on which AI tools we can use safely.
My manager communicates clear expectations about how we might use AI (if at all).
My manager would need extra support to coach us on AI usage.
In my team, we have at least one “AI champion” who others ask for help.
Our performance and development talks already touch on AI skills and future workflows.

Optional overall question

How satisfied are you with the AI training and support provided by our company? (0 = Not at all, 10 = Very)

Open-ended questions

What is one thing the company could start doing to help you use AI in your work?
What is one challenge or obstacle you face with AI tools or training today?
What is one thing you wish your manager or HR would stop doing around AI implementation or communication?
What additional AI skills or topics would you like training on in the next 12 months?

Decision table for your AI training needs assessment

Question area	Score / threshold	Recommended action	Owner	Goal / deadline
Skills & comfort (AI basics, prompting, evaluation)	Average score <3.0	Roll out basic AI literacy & prompting workshops; create simple internal “prompt cheat sheets”.	L&D / HR	Within 14 days: schedule first sessions and share materials
Current AI usage (adoption & frequency)	<20% use AI weekly	Run live demos of approved tools and “office hours” to test real use cases.	HR Business Partners + Team leads	Within 30 days: 1 demo per key department
Use cases & pain points (automation potential)	>50% report repetitive tasks, low clarity on use cases	Facilitate team workshops to map workflows and prioritise 3–5 AI use cases per team.	Team leads with HR support	Within 21 days: workshop completed, list of prioritised use cases documented
Risks & concerns (privacy, job security, compliance)	Concern items ≥4.0 on average	Organise Q&A with Data Protection, IT and Works Council; publish a short AI policy & FAQ.	HR, Legal, Data Protection Officer	Within 7 days: Q&A scheduled; within 30 days: policy published
Learning preferences (formats, language, pace)	Strong preference for specific formats (≥60% pick same)	Design AI training paths that match preferred formats (e.g. microlearning + labs).	L&D	Within 45 days: draft learning journeys for key role groups
Manager & team needs (support & guidelines)	Manager support scores <3.0	Provide short manager training on coaching AI use and discussing risks with teams.	HR / People Development	Within 30 days: manager sessions completed for all pilots
Overall alignment (all sections)	Any section <3.0 in a specific department	Set up a 90-minute AI needs workshop for that department and agree a concrete action plan.	HR Business Partner + Department head	Within 21 days: workshop held; within 7 additional days: plan shared

Key takeaways

Use this survey to map AI skills, fears, and concrete team workflows.
Trigger training only where data shows low confidence or high manual effort.
Combine survey insights with 90-minute workshops to prioritise AI use cases.
Segment results by role and skill level to design tailored AI learning paths.
Address GDPR, AVV and works council topics early to build lasting trust.

Definition & scope

This ai training needs assessment measures how employees use, understand and feel about AI in their real roles. It targets all relevant staff groups, from frontline to management, and can be run company-wide or per department. The output supports decisions on AI training programs, role-based learning paths, policy updates, and where to focus pilots before scaling.

Scoring & thresholds for your AI training needs assessment

The survey uses a 1–5 Likert scale for most questions. Scores <3.0 indicate clear action need, 3.0–3.9 show “watch and support”, and ≥4.0 means the area is broadly healthy. Work with averages per item and per dimension (skills, usage, risk, managers) and use thresholds to trigger standard follow-up steps instead of ad-hoc reactions.

Define the scale clearly: 1 = Strongly disagree, 5 = Strongly agree; 0–10 for the satisfaction item.
Treat dimension averages <3.0 as critical and require a response plan within 14 days.
If 3.0–3.9, plan lighter interventions (optional training, peer sharing, more communication).
Flag departments with ≥0.5 points gap versus company average for targeted support.
Document which thresholds trigger which actions so decisions stay consistent across cycles.

Follow-up & responsibilities

Clear ownership keeps this survey from becoming another “nice dashboard”. HR coordinates, but managers, IT, Legal and works council have defined roles. Set response times: very low scores or strong risk signals deserve a response within ≤24–48 hours; standard training actions can follow within 2–4 weeks.

HR/People Team analyses results and shares a simple summary by department within 3 working days.
Managers discuss their team’s scores (especially any item ≤2.0) within 7 days in a regular meeting.
L&D designs or adapts AI training offers for groups with low skill/usage scores within 30 days.
IT, Legal and Data Protection handle critical privacy/compliance flags within ≤48 hours.
Works council is involved early in interpreting results and co-designing guardrails for AI use.

90-minute AI training needs workshop (team-level)

Combine survey data with a short workshop to make AI opportunities concrete. Run this as a standard 90-minute format with one team at a time. You can use a collaboration tool or physical sticky notes; a talent platform like Sprad Growth can also help capture follow-up actions and owners.

0–10 min: Share key survey insights for this team; clarify goals and boundaries of AI use.
10–35 min: Map 5–10 typical workflows on a board (steps, tools, pain points, manual effort).
35–60 min: Mark where AI could help (drafting, summarising, data checks, templates, automation).
60–80 min: Prioritise top 3 use cases by impact and feasibility; rate each High/Medium/Low.
80–90 min: Agree owners, next steps and timelines; log them in your HR or project system.

Fairness, bias checks & DACH specifics

AI brings both opportunity and risk. Your ai training needs assessment should surface uneven access, confidence gaps and legal worries without exposing individuals. Segment results by relevant groups and respect GDPR, AVV and works council agreements so employees feel safe to answer honestly.

Analyse scores by department, role level, location, tenure, and remote vs on-site to spot gaps.
If non-technical roles or older age groups show lower confidence, offer targeted, slower-paced sessions.
Use anonymity rules (e.g. show aggregated data only for groups ≥7 respondents) to protect identities.
Clarify in advance who sees raw data, how long it’s stored, and under which GDPR legal basis.
Agree an AVV (data processing agreement) with survey providers and involve the Betriebsrat before rollout.

Examples / use cases

Case 1: Low AI skills, high manual workload in Finance
Finance teams reported low scores on AI basics and prompting (2.4) but very high time spent on manual reporting. HR and L&D ran two hands-on labs focused on real monthly reports, using an approved AI tool to build draft analyses and commentary. Within 2 months, Finance self-rated skills improved to 3.7, and month-end closing time dropped by 15%.

Case 2: High privacy concerns in HR and Legal
HR and Legal teams showed strong worries about GDPR and confidentiality (average 4.3 on risk items), even though usage was already significant. HR invited the Data Protection Officer and works council to a joint Q&A, and they co-created a short AI policy with green/yellow/red examples of data usage. In the follow-up pulse, trust in rules rose from 2.8 to 4.1, while usage stayed stable and safer.

Case 3: Power users hidden in Operations
Operations staff in several plants used private AI tools daily but scored low on “manager support” and “clarity on approved tools”. The survey helped HR identify “power users” and turn them into local AI champions. They co-designed simple checklists for shift handovers and quality checks. After 3 months, rework rates decreased and managers requested a broader skill management approach, supported by resources from the Skill Management guide.

Implementation, analysis & updates

Treat your ai training needs assessment as a recurring process, not a one-off project. Start small with a pilot, refine questions and thresholds, then roll out gradually. Use insights to build role-based AI learning paths and to keep your AI training program in sync with changing tools and regulations.

Implementation roadmap

Pilot: Run the survey and 1 workshop in one department within 30 days; involve its manager and Betriebsrat.
Refine: Adjust unclear questions, thresholds and communication based on pilot feedback within 14 days.
Rollout: Extend to more departments or the whole company in waves over the next 60–90 days.
Integrate: Link results to development plans, performance talks and role profiles so AI skills become part of everyday HR.
Review: Re-run the survey at least annually and a short pulse every 6–12 months to track progress.

Segmentation & training design

Use survey data to cluster employees into a few practical segments. Typical patterns in DACH companies: AI beginners, cautious experimenters and power users. Training and communication should differ per segment – otherwise you either bore advanced users or overwhelm starters. You can link this segmentation later into a broader talent or internal marketplace approach, supported for example by the concepts in the Talent Management guide.

Segment	Typical signals	Training focus	Owner & timing
AI beginners	Low skills & usage, high concerns	AI basics, safe prompting, simple use cases, GDPR rules	L&D + team leads; start within 4 weeks after survey
Cautious experimenters	Medium skills, some usage, strong risk awareness	Deeper workflows, evaluation skills, clear policies, peer labs	HR + IT; design labs within 6 weeks
Power users	High skills, high usage, low perceived support	Advanced patterns, automation, champion role, governance inputs	HR + managers; engage as champions within 3 weeks

Metrics & continuous improvement

Track a few simple metrics to check whether your ai training needs assessment and follow-up work. Connect them to your broader people analytics and AI program KPIs. Over time, this data helps you refine investments and show where AI training really pays off.

Survey participation rate (target ≥70%) and coverage across key departments and role levels.
Average scores per dimension (skills, usage, risk, managers) and their change over 6–12 months.
Training completion and satisfaction for AI modules by segment (beginners, experimenters, power users).
Adoption metrics from tools (e.g. AI features used per week) where privacy rules allow aggregated reporting.
Business outcomes tied to AI pilots (time saved, error rates, throughput) documented in simple before/after comparisons.

If you plan a broader AI capability strategy, resources like AI training for employees, AI training for HR teams and the guide on designing AI training programs for companies fit well with this survey template.

Conclusion

This ai training needs assessment gives you a structured way to understand where your organisation stands on AI – not just tools, but skills, risks, and concrete workflows. Instead of buying generic training for everyone, you see which roles are ready for deeper AI use, where fundamentals are missing, and where privacy or job fears would block adoption.

The survey also improves the quality of conversations. Managers can talk to teams about real data, not assumptions, and workshops move from abstract AI hype to “these three processes we’ll improve in the next quarter”. Clear thresholds and owners turn results into concrete steps, while GDPR and works council involvement keep trust high.

Next steps can be simple: pick one pilot department, set up the survey in your HR or survey tool (or in a talent platform that supports AI skills and development, such as Sprad Growth combined with Atlas AI), align with the Betriebsrat, and run your first 90-minute workshop. Use the findings to design 2–3 role-based AI learning paths, then repeat the survey after a few months to see what changed. Over time, this creates a living, data-driven view of AI capability across your company.

FAQ

Q: How often should we run this AI skills survey?
A: Start with a baseline at the beginning of your AI program or before a bigger rollout. Then repeat a lighter version every 6–12 months, or when you introduce major new AI tools. Leave enough time (at least 3–4 months) between surveys so training and policy changes can have visible effects.

Q: What should we do if some teams show very low scores?
A: Use low scores as a signal, not a failure. Follow the decision table: organise focused workshops, basic literacy training, and targeted communication for those teams. For very low scores (≤2.0) on risk or trust items, involve Data Protection and works council quickly, and agree a clear message about boundaries and support.

Q: How do we handle critical comments or fear of job loss?
A: Treat comments about job security and surveillance very seriously. Respond openly in team meetings and written FAQs, explain which decisions AI will not make alone, and how retraining or internal mobility will work. According to a OECD analysis, transparent reskilling paths reduce resistance to automation.

Q: How can we involve managers and HR business partners?
A: Brief managers before launch so they understand survey goals and their follow-up role. Share their team’s results quickly with simple visuals and a short script for team discussions. HR business partners can help interpret patterns, moderate workshops, and connect AI training to existing performance or development processes.

Q: How do we keep the questionnaire and thresholds up to date?
A: After each cycle, review which questions produced useful decisions and which stayed unused. Remove or reword low-value items, and add 2–3 new questions on emerging tools or regulations if needed. Check whether your thresholds still make sense as scores improve; you can raise expectations over time. Agree a yearly review with HR, IT, Legal and works council to keep the survey aligned with your AI strategy.

Jürgen Ulbrich

CEO & Co-Founder of Sprad

Jürgen Ulbrich has more than a decade of experience in developing and leading high-performing teams and companies. As an expert in employee referral programs as well as feedback and performance processes, Jürgen has helped over 100 organizations optimize their talent acquisition and development strategies.

Get your free Badge now