Who sources the mandate while your recruiter sells?
You brief the mandate in two minutes. Atlas searches, writes the outreach and pre-qualifies every reply — an extra sourcer on every desk, at no extra headcount.
Candidates, referrals and the people Atlas finds all land in one place — and the search, the outreach and the first structured conversation run on their own. Availability, radius, shift readiness and wage expectation sit on the profile before a recruiter picks up the phone.
Placement revenue fell to 2.78 billion euros in 2025. The commission goes to whoever gets a qualified shortlist to the client first.
61.9% of people open to switching would use a staffing agency to do it. They are not the bottleneck — being reached first is.
Candidates in volume, and no way to tell them apart. The one who cannot start for eight weeks looks identical to the one who starts Monday.
Sources: BDU 2025 · Barometer Personalvermittlung 2025 (GVP/index) · GVP, April 2025
Sourcing, screening and referrals are three doors into the same base — and the fourth is what develops the people who came through them. On a staffing desk the search leads, because the fee follows whoever finds them first.
You brief the mandate in two minutes. Atlas searches, writes the outreach and pre-qualifies every reply — an extra sourcer on every desk, at no extra headcount.
A structured conversation the moment a candidate is sourced or applies — voice or video, a phone call, or a web chat. Your recruiters spend their hours on the shortlist, not on the first call.
Documents are still verified by a human. You just know before the client interview whether it is worth scheduling one.
In Zeitarbeit your workforce is on assignment, not in the office. Openings go automatically to the temp workers they fit, on the channels they already use.
Placed in spring, gone by summer, and the fit was never checked — then the same mandate costs you the search twice. In Zeitarbeit the worker is your employee, and the same base that got someone placed is the one that develops them: what they can do, what would raise the rate you can bill, and how the assignment is actually going.
We put the same three hard-to-fill roles through four competing sourcing tools and through Atlas. Every system finds its own hits, so those are taken out of the count. What is left is the fair question: of the people the others found, how many did you find too?
Juicebox
Metaview
LinkedInThree real roles in three markets, 15 August 2026. Every system that takes free text got the word-for-word identical prompt; for LinkedIn Sales Navigator the same criteria were translated into filters. Atlas covers 38 percent of what the others found. The best of the other four covers 9 percent.
See the full benchmark →Whoever applies, gets referred or gets sourced keeps one living profile — owned by them, readable by you. Every door makes it richer, and your system stays in the loop. The forklift driver who could not start in March is the one who starts Monday in September, and you will know.
Priya Sharma
Milan Weiss
Sofia Costa
André Kamga
Jana Rieger
Jonas Berger


Your HRIS



Your ATS
Talent keep their own profile current, because it works for them too. So your database never ages: whoever was not available two years ago is findable and current today.
More than a CV: availability, deployment radius, licences and certificates, shift readiness, evidence from real conversations. Every rating links back to the sentence it came from.
Sprad runs both ways with the system you already use for candidates and clients. No migration, no second tool to maintain — and if you have no ATS at all, ours is free.
Everyone you ever sourced, placed or got referred sits in one place that belongs to you — not in a recruiter's private spreadsheet that walks out of the door with them. The profile itself belongs to the person, which is why they keep it current. You can search it in free text, you can see the evidence behind every entry, and you can take it with you if you ever change your system.
Throughput per recruiter is the lever. Sourcing runs in parallel on every desk, and candidates are pre-qualified the moment they surface — availability, mobility and wage expectation against tariff — so a recruiter can get a qualified shortlist to a client while the candidate is still genuinely open to the move. That is where the commission gets decided.
Because the fee follows whoever reaches the candidate first, and 61.9% of people open to switching would use an agency to do it. They are willing; they are just not applying. Screening switches on the moment candidates do arrive, on the same base, without a new setup.
It asks directly and checks the answer against the GVP/DGB reference tariff for the role, recorded as a fact. A mismatch surfaces before a client interview gets scheduled, not after.
Yes. Assignment duration is recorded from placement, so nobody discovers the cap is approaching after it is already a problem.
Each client engagement gets its own data room, and a candidate's information is not visible across competing mandates. That is separation per client, not a full white-label product. Worth knowing exactly what you are getting before you rely on it.
About a third of all placements in this market are helper-level roles, and the same structured conversation runs at that volume. Availability and shift readiness checked as rigorously as for a specialist role, just faster.
No. Sprad runs alongside the system you already use for candidate and client management, and results land where your team already works. If you don't have one, ours is free to start with.
Fifteen minutes, your open role, your numbers.